Liars and Frauds: Cultural Marxism: Politicians, Scientists, Academics, Media and Activists: The point however, is that this is either scientific nonsense, or our legal and ethics systems are complete BS. Nobody in today's libertarian bleeding heart society accepts that rape is defensible, so either rape victims should just get over it and deal with it like the animals do, or this evolutionary scientific theory is little more than a method to either keep the theory of evolution alive, or to promote ones scientific self.
I have written several articles about Media and Academic Lies and Liars (listed at the end of this article), but today, I want to shift the focus from things like 'The Media, Israel & Reutersgate', and 'Laws of Evidence in Archaeology', to other issues that relate to Scientific Butt covering and just plain fraud.
This article focuses on four reports, two of which deal with the theme of Evolution and Divine Creation. These two are not cited to support Evolution, but to draw attention to scientific BS.
Report 1 seems to be saying that in order to keep evolutionary theory in tact, it is necessary to accept that humans, after splitting from Monkeys millenia earlier, rejoined them.
Report 2 is a report about how rape is justified on the basis of Evolutionary theory.
Report 3 is about the most recent fraud in relation to stem cell research, and
Report 4 is about 'fakery' in the Media
January 2008 Update.
This Link, will take you to another article at KingsCalendar whose title might confuse you. Published January 2008, it is very pertinent to the issues in regard to Political Correctness Abuse of Society.
In a recent series of articles at Apologetics Press, in the Sensible Science Section, there was a new article entitled: Genes Don't Jibe With Fossils by Brad Harrub, Ph.D. It concerns itself with a recent report, the reference for which is: Patterson, Nick, Daniel J. Richter, et al., (2006), 'Genetic Evidence for Complex Speciation of Humans and Chimpanzees,' Nature, 441:1103-1108, June 29.
This is just a snippet of what Doctor Harrub writes:
Nick Patterson and his colleagues conducted a study identifying the genetic divergence between humans and chimpanzees (Patterson, et al., 2006, 441:1103).
They allege we evolved from some common ancestor millions of years ago, but for some unexplained reason, we decided to revisit our primate ancestors from whom we had split millions of years earlier. They give no indication of how or why this occurred. Instead, they speculate freely about coming back together in an effort to mend bridges with anthropologists and to ensure no one ever questions the validity of the evolutionary 'History' of mankind.
This article is not a religious 'let's knock evolution' article, but an examination of the huge rift that this recent announcement causes. Dr. Harrub demonstrates how it contradicts definitive statements already in the textbooks, and goes on to relate how this discrepancy is dismissed, by stating that perhaps there is a problem with the molecular clock.
Even this suggestion would cause all previous evolutionary theories to be put aside and reworked. The real point of the article, is the lengths to which scientists will go in order to get us to accept as legitimate, things which all too frequently are later demonstrated to be incorrect.
One of my constant refrains, is not to believe what scientist say, just because they are scientists. If you only immerse yourself in one theory, you will fail to find its' faults, and in the process, demonstrate a complete lack of 'scientific methodology'.
In the second report, also from Apologetics Press : Sensible Science, in an article entitled: Evolution and the Blame Game by Eric Lyons, M.Min., attention is drawn to some rather remarkable (evolutionary) scientific conclusions concerning rape. To quote briefly from Mr. Lyons article:
In 2000, Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer authored A Natural History of Rape in which they alleged that evolutionary theory applies to rape, as it does to other areas of human affairs, on both logical and evidentiary grounds.
There is no legitimate scientific reason not to apply evolutionary or ultimate hypotheses to rape (p. 55). They continued: Human rape arises from men's evolved machinery for obtaining a high number of mates in an environment where females choose mates?(p. 190, emp. added).
Although Thornhill and Palmer 'would like to see rape eradicated from human life' (p. xi), they are forced to conclude, in essence, that nothing is ultimately wrong with the practice (see Butt, 2005 for more discussion).
Having introduced and discussed this topic, Mr. Lyons sets forth some other issues concerning which we might like to claim that we are only acting out our biological or evolutionary urges. As he posits:
Can you imagine if such argumentation was used in theft and murder trials: 'I'm not guilty because my animal instincts made me do it!'
Actually he seems not to be aware that the feminazi's do in fact use this line quite often.
The point however, is that this is either scientific nonsense, or our legal and ethics systems are complete BS. Nobody in today's libertarian bleeding heart society accepts that rape is defensible, so either rape victims should just get over it and deal with it like the animals do, or this evolutionary scientific theory is little more than a method to either keep the theory of evolution alive, or to promote ones scientific self.
In relation to the series at King's Calendar on the rules of evidence in archaeology, I make this precise claim. Often what is passed off as some 'fact' is just another opinion by which one promotes ones standing in the academic community.
Recently there was quite a commotion about a Korean fraud in relation to embryonic cloning. This article deals with a new and similarly fraudulent claim. Mr. cook asks:
What magic is there in embryonic stem cells to make some scientists so economical with the truth and some science journals so credulous? Only a few months after the disgraceful Korean stem cell scandal, another scientist has again announced a breakthrough, and has again been denounced as a liar.
But the real point he expresses thusly:
The most astonishing feature of this shabby episode is that the publication as prestigious as 'Nature', colluded in it. It rushed Lanza's article into print, accepted his line about an ethical breakthrough, and even posted an on-line image of a mature, healthy embryo which had survived a biopsy.
What we see from this report is that far too many organisations jump onto anything that will promote their philosophy. They don't take the time to verify anything, and I have made the same comment myself.
Firstly, we should not be seeking out what supports our particular philosophy or worldview, but rather take the time to discover if what we have been told is in fact true. When truth is bypassed to foster an agenda, that agenda is not really worth anything at all.
Now this brings me to the final report, also from TCS Daily, entitled: FX May Soon Be Short for Faux By Glenn Harlan Reynolds, in which he discusses photographic fakery in the media. He states that:
In a democratic polity -- or even one that's driven by things like "world opinion" -- faked news poses a real threat to decent decision-making. Worse yet, the likely outcome of widespread fakery will be a tendency on the part of people to simply dismiss news that they don't want to hear. (And we already see enough of that phenomenon as it is).
Context is key. And one of the lessons of these various affairs is that neither the photo, nor the purveyor of the photo, should be given unquestioned authority. Instead, we have to think for ourselves, and make up our own minds. Because it turns out that we can't trust, well, much of anyone.
This brings me to something my now deceased father once told me (actually he constantly reminded me), that you should believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see.
We as human beings have a tremendous capacity for not just deceiving others, but for deceiving ourselves, and in today's 'party line' mentality, we are constantly being forced to accept whatever the powers that be in our philosophy say we should accept. We don't bother to find out for ourselves, and are often punished for any type of dissension or infraction of the 'faith'.
Constantly in the press we read of people being called, leftists, rightests, fundamentalists, fanatics or whatever. This is a blatant attempt to blackball by name calling discrimination, anyone who does not agree with our philosophical ideology. [Terribly Non PC isn't it?]
As I wrote in What is Truth? A Political Camera Angle! : Truth should be acknowledged, even if it does not suit our agenda. This of course brings me to something else my dad used to say: "People always believe what they prefer to believe, irrespective of the truth."
By the way, given that we have already referred to articles on evolution, you might find this hard to believe, but in one article at Apologetics Press Americans come a close second to the Turks in rejecting the Theory of Evolution. [Check it out!]
Sometimes Academics cannot see the forest for the trees. I pointed this out in a wonderful joke found HERE
Sometimes sectarian semi-academic groups will try to convince us that what is so is not so, and that we should not accept historical records. SeeHEREandHERE.
Sometimes we get lucky, and the very people our hearts bleed for, have the audacity to stand up and tell us the truth. SeeHERE
But generally speaking, we tend to allow ourselves to be deceived, because it suits our particular agenda. We don't take the time anymore to discover the truth for ourselves. Truth, Justice and the American Way might have been superman's motto, but very few of us today share those qualities. We prefer to be told what to believe, or prefer only to be told what we already believe.
For those of you who don't know me, I am an Australian living in Communist China, 'and loving it!' (to quote Maxwell Smart). But really, what is the difference between the free and democratic western world and Communist China?
You might also want to cry: 'There is no free press in China!' But do you really believe that you have a free and unbiased press in your country?
You might want to object that in China, people are not free to think and say what they want. But do you really think that in your country that you are free to think and say what you want?
You might want to scream: 'The Chinese government suppresses religious freedom!' But do you really believe that religion is not suppressed in your country?
Maybe you think that China is a sexist country. Of course Sexism is taboo in your country.
In the final analysis, we only believe what we want to believe, and most of us are incapable of determining for ourselves what it is that we believe. We need the help of the Media, our political party, our religious affiliation, our libertarian ideologies and of course, those wonderful academics who would never try to bamboozle us with BS.
Where were these PC (expletive) when I and others were writing years ago about the Syrian crisis? Did they care about the Syrian people? No they didn’t! Do these same sociopathic western political activists who would call me a racist support Muslim and other cultures similar practices such as female circumcision? – polygamy? – arranged marriages? No they don’t! They outlaw it! So don’t talk to me about how I am a racist!
I do apologize for the singing – mine – and by way of explanation, the reason that you hear me saying ‘hello’ (twice) is that a man told his son to say hello and when I decided to say ‘hello’ a lady walking passed me thought I had said it to her and so she also greeted me with ‘hello!’
Everyone is so concerned to be politically correct and so worried about being perceived racist, that they fail to see that in fact the true racists with the truly incorrect political agenda are the ones pointing the finger and doing the name calling. (In psychology it would be called reaction formation; the suppression of one impulse by the promotion of a counter impulse.)
Ambassador (Retired) Yoram Ettinger has produced a mini-seminar video on United States, Israel and Middle East Policy and Security, and the seminar has also been produced as a series of separate Six Minute Videos, some of which have appeared embedded in their text format published here at Kingscalendar. Below is provided for you the links to The YouTube 6 minute video series
Having met up with my pen friend we went ‘somewhere’ and there was this big open paved garden type area and there were platforms going nowhere which you ascended by climbing stairs. Through the middle of the paved courtyard-garden ran a little pond. I was fully aware of its existence but so focused was I on taking a good photo that I was walking while looking through the viewfinder of the camera. I fell straight into the pond.
The point in providing these videos on behalf of the Clarion Project is to hopefully assist in getting the word out that the extreme liberal progressive ideology does not represent REALITY when dealing with the politically motivated fundamentalist Islamist plan.
Since 2004 he has been writing academic articles, social commentaries and photographic 'Stories from China' both here at KingsCalendar, and formerly as a contributing columnist at Magic City Morning Star News (Maine USA) where from 2009 to 2015 he was Stand-in Editor. He currently has a column at iPatriot.com and teaches English to Business English and Flight Attendant College Students in Suzhou City Jiangsu Province People's Republic of China.)
BenDedek originally created the site to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran.' Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah. Check the Chapter Precis Page to see details of each chapter and to gain access to the Four Free to Air Chapters
(The Download book does not contain a section on Seder Olam)
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]