Feminism : Misandry : Abuse: Discrimination: Political Correctness Abuse: Female Abusers: It is important, in safeguarding our children, to know which groups of men put children at most risk of abuse. The study documented that of the 26 percent of males who abuse children sexually, 30 percent are stepfathers, 24 percent are adoptive fathers, and 20 percent are the mothers' boyfriends. None of these were the biological fathers of the children. Together, these groups represent three-fourths of the abusing males in our society.
Spousal Abuse, Child Abuse and The Insidious Side of Feminism
More than half of the 45 women on death row are there for killing their husbands and/or children and almost all reported that no one believed them when they cried out for help saying "I cannot be trusted with my children." - We are constantly indoctrinated to believe that Women are Angels
Since then, I have done some research on my own, and want to draw attention to a few websites, and the material that they contain, on the issue of domestic violence and child abuse. I will provide here just a few quotes from each article, and leave it to the reader to check out the websites.
I did not specifically choose any of these sites.
I merely clicked onto links listed on the google search engine.
Reena Sommer, Gordon E. Barnes and Robert P. Murray (1991) in a study of 1257 (615 male and 642 females) Winnipeg residents, found that approximately 39 percent (39.1%) of married or cohabiting females participated in at least one form of spouse abuse with their current partner.
The following stats provided by The Men`s Television Network (905)898-1107 M. McLeod, researcher, found violence against men is more destructive than violence against women. Her study revealed that women utilized weapons in 80% of cases. M. McLeod, "Women Against Men", Justice Quarterly, 1, 1984
A study of 150 Quaker families found the incidence of severe wife-to-husband violence to be three times that of husband-to-wife violence Brutz and Ingoldsby, 1984
Research confirms that male victims of severe violence by female partners encounter widespread bias if they try to get the authorities involved. Anson Shupe, Indiana University/Purdue University, 1994
In a 1986 study, Professor Eugen Lupri found the overall violence index was 17.8% for men and 23.3% for women. Eugen Lupri, University of Calgary, 1986
It is important, in safeguarding our children, to know which groups of men put children at most risk of abuse. The study documented that of the 26 percent of males who abuse children sexually, 30 percent are stepfathers, 24 percent are adoptive fathers, and 20 percent are the mothers' boyfriends. None of these were the biological fathers of the children. Together, these groups represent three-fourths of the abusing males in our society.
Biological or actual fathers of the children accounted for 7 percent of the incidents of sexual abuse, while "combination" fathers (men who were biologically related to one victim and the stepfather of another) were responsible for another 7 percent.
#3: Studies show that the overwhelming majority of steadily employed divorced fathers pay their child support. While there are a few well-heeled divorced dads who stiff their children, most non-paying dads are either poor, unemployed, disabled, or incarcerated. According to a US Government Accounting Office report, two-thirds of those fathers who do not pay their child support fail to do so because they are financially unable to do so.? Research References are provided on this site for the statements made
#7: Most child abuse and parental murder of children is committed by mothers, not fathers.
This site refutes much of the above mentioned material, and for balance should be read. However, one thing I read did disturb me.
Men's and fathers' rights groups prefer to lump unproven yet most likely true allegations of abuse into the bona fide false allegations category.
This is a dangerous statement
Whilst we know that more guilty people are let free from criminal courts, than innocent people are found guilty, the danger inherent in the statement made on this site, is that ultimately, we can be required to convict people on what we want to believe.What is Truth? A Political Camera Angle!
I remember in Australia many years ago, the horrendous time that the Chamberlains were put through, because everyone preferred to believe that Lindy Chamberlain murdered her daughter Azaria, rather than believe the story that a dingo stole the baby.
In the intervening years since Lindy Chamberlain was pardoned, numerous similar incidents have occurred, even to the point of a 9 year old boy being killed by a dingo. I think that no one today seriously believes that Lindy Chamberlain killed her child. This is what can happen when we prefer to believe our own philosophies.
I also remember that a few years ago in Australia, a young school boy made allegations of sexual misconduct against a male teacher. This was in fact, the second time that this boy had made such allegations. On the first occasion, the male teacher lost his career, his reputation, his wife and his children.
On the second occasion, the charge was actually disproved. After further investigation by police in relation to the first matter, the boy confessed that he had on that occasion, also lied. He destroyed a man's life.
What we want to believe and what is true are not always the same, and we can't blame either side of the fence [in relation to the Men's group figures] for promoting what they believe. We are however required to stick with the actual evidence.
The question that needs answering, is: What does the empirical evidence require us to accept?
Social Experiments: A good article on the empirical evidence of the positive necessity for children to have fathers.
July 10th 2006 Addition:
On the Issue of Dangerous Statements, Empirical evidence and things that are "most likely true" take a look at the article entitled: Analysis: Another Man Serves Hard Time for Bogus Rape Charges By Jim Kouri, CPP
A New York man was freed after enduring over 20 years in prison for a rape he didn't commit and he's one of the lucky ones.
The result: 60% of the accusations were identified as false. McDowell also took his study outside the military by examining police files from a major midwestern city and a southwestern city. He found again that 60% of the claims of rape were false.
But feminists and left-wing activists will dismiss these studies as biased because men where involved. For instance, one feminist, Wendy Kaminer, stated that "it is a primary article of faith among many feminists that women don't lie about rape, ever; they lack the dishonesty gene." Anyone believing women lack a dishonesty gene never dated women. If they do lack that gene, then someone out there is performing miraculous surgery to implant that gene. What's so amazing about such statements is: they are not based on any scientific evidence; and it is a sexist premise.
Women are responsible for more than half of all child abuse cases in Queensland and are much more likely to neglect their children than men, a new report has found.
The report shows there were 13,184 substantiated child abuse cases across Queensland in 2005-06. Women were responsible for 7,319 - or 55.5 per cent - of cases, and males for 5,846, or 44.3 per cent.
In 2005-06, females were responsible for 80.2 per cent of all cases of neglect - 3,283 cases compared 799 cases for men.
Child Safety Minister Desley Boyle said the findings shattered society's image of the caring and devoted mother and the belief that men were more likely to abuse children. "We have an idealised image of mothers - that they feed their kids before themselves - but I'm sorry to say, it's not always true," Ms Boyle said.
All forms of abuse are serious, but the least recognised is Emotional Abuse. In the Article entitled: Emotional Abuse and Female Emotional Abusers this issue is examined. It touches upon Religious abuse, Political Activist abuse, Feminist Abuse, Child abuse, and Men who are abused by women.
Lets face it, these changes are only being instigated because enough women have sounded off about their (probably exaggerated) concerns (I am racking my brain trying to recall the last time I saw a headline about such an occurrence of molestation actually occurring on a plane) or does this mean that it is occurring and these airlines know about it and are now trying to cover their collective arses, or does this just mean that more paedophile males prefer to fly Qantas and Air New Zealand and the airlines have just figgered this out and are afraid of the bad publicity.[/
The debate over whether access to pornography can change the way a person behaves - or, indeed, whether it will ultimately lead to the collapse of Western culture - has raged for decades, even centuries. Ask any Feminazi and they will tell you that men are degenerates, and that porno degrades women and leads to all sorts of manifestations of sexism and discrimination. But AS PROVED in this article, porno affects no one. (The Fems lied!)
Emotional Abuse: Child Abuse: Husband Abuse: Female Abusers: Activist Abuse: in this article, I am going to look at the issue of 'Emotional Abuse', through a variety of lenses. Each lens filters and uses information gleaned from articles related to the abuse of men by women. We will start with a look at abuse within religious and political contexts, before moving on to address issues related to Children and their fathers.
I constantly rail against all those wonderful apparently 'human loving' individuals who in their 'alleged' love for humanity would not hesitate to commit murder at the drop of a hat because they are just so damn sure of the righteousness of their cause and their actions. If you look at the history of totalitarianism in the 20th century, you will see that the first step in the long march to success, is to rip apart the traditional fabric of society. The politically correct who want to control our thoughts and actions, have already made sure that their own 'personal' objections to minority culture have already been excised
To paraphrase a Biblical saying, it seems that nowadays, it is easier for "a camel to fit through the eye of a needle" than to find someone who speaks plainly, says what he means and means what he says. Political correctness makes my skin crawl, and yes, from those who take either side of an issue. I have always believed "everything in moderation." That means being nice too. If being nice means someone is obscuring or twisting the truth, there is nothing at all "nice" about that
'The Forces of Evil are winning! Everyone is just too afraid! Most people have believed the lie!' Everyone is so concerned to be politically correct and so worried about being perceived racist, that they fail to see that in fact, the true racists with the truly incorrect political agenda, are the ones pointing the finger and doing the name calling
We live in a complex world that just loves to reduce everything to slogans and catch phrases. In today's politically correct world, I can call you a whole string of bad names and get away with it, unless I happen to include some reference to your colour, ethnicity, gender or sexual preference. (The words White - Caucasian - Male and Heterosexual are not however considered derogatory or offensive.) At that point, you will be permitted to claim that you suffered from 'emotional pain, distress or trauma'. This would classify you as having been 'emotionally abused'. Emotional Abuse for Emotional Abusers is a way of living and coping - it is their method of relating to those around them. It is very much a part of their character - to belittle, wound, manipulate, control, and otherwise mistreat by withholding love, or putting conditions on love or acceptance
A basic tenet of feminist theory is its view of intimate violence as a manifestation of our culture's "patriarchal" structure, with its attendant differential status, power, and control, which are reflected in individuals' attitudes and behaviours. Dobash et al. (1998, 1992) propose that gender asymmetry in partner violence reflects a context of gender inequality both within the household and in the larger society. Their research program conceptualizes men as perpetrators and women as victims, but it fails to provide comparative findings on woman-to-man verbal and physical abuse to validate these gendered patterns.
Yesterday, Wednesday November 14th, 2012 at about 11am Beijing Time or about dawn in Israel, I published an article at Kingscalendar asking why Israel does not fight back. This morning (7 am Beijing Time) I read that Israel had commenced operations against Gaza. Tonight (6.15pm Beijing Time) as I sit in China reading world news I am disgusted by what I see.
What other country in history has ever been required to provide all the basic necessities to enable their enemy to attack and murder them? Until Israel wakes up to the fact that no one really cares about Israel or Jews; until Israel wakes up that Political Correctness is just a tool by which people can hide their true feelings whilst showing a compassionate face, then Israel is doing nothing more than committing slow suicide. No one cares! No one wants Israel there! They all want to lick the boots of Activist Agendas and Arab Oil and they believe that Israel is worth sacrificing if it means peace from terrorism (but it won't).
Mingxing's company had booked him into the upmarket Kempinski Hotel in Wuxi and he organized and paid for one extra day so that we could go sightseeing. There are two photos in Part one that relate to the Kempinski Hotel Room, but this photo is of the lavish foyer of the Hotel as taken from the first floor landing above the coffee shop. Whilst the Big Buddha is the 'centerpiece' so to speak, the real spectacular is to be found in the Cultural Museum. This place is one helluva spectacular place inside. It sits directly opposite the replica of the Potala Palace, and when you enter you are required to put coverings over your shoes. I suspect that the real reason is to cut down on the cleaning bill. This place was crowded and all those people shuffling along wearing shoe protectors gave the marble floor a really high sheen.
It was decided that unshod horses would not be allowed to be used in commercial ventures. People couldn't ride horses for a living; salesman couldn't load goods onto their horses; and horses could no longer pull carts. While it all seemed quite logical and humane, the unforeseen consequence of the law was that the supply of goods into and out of the town began to dwindle, until in the end, business after business went bankrupt. As time went by the whole city went bust until the only ones left were those who could not afford to move, and one of these was our blacksmith. One day, considering that since the council itself was now gone, the blacksmith decided to restart his business.
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]
About the KingsCalendar Publisher
R.P.BenDedek is the owner and Editor of KingsCalendar.com which was originally set up to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran'.
Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah.