Paedophilia: Feminism: Political Agendas in Sexuality: Divorce: Political Correctness: Sexism: Emotional Abuse: - Lets face it, these changes are only being instigated because enough women have sounded off about their (probably exaggerated) concerns (I am racking my brain trying to recall the last time I saw a headline about such an occurrence of molestation actually occurring on a plane) or does this mean that it is occurring and these airlines know about it and are now trying to cover their collective arses, or does this just mean that more paedophile males prefer to fly Qantas and Air New Zealand and the airlines have just figgered this out and are afraid of the bad publicity.
More than half of the 45 women on death row are there for killing their husbands and/or children and almost all reported that no one believed them when they cried out for help saying "I cannot be trusted with my children." - We are constantly indoctrinated to believe that Women are Angels
Dads In Distress
This week on the King's Calendar website, I posted the content of an email I had received, and tagged onto the end a few comments. The email was from Tony Miller at Dads in Distress, an organisation dedicated to assisting men who, through divorce are separated from their children.
The email concerned a recent decision by Air New Zealand and Qantas Airlines, to remove male passengers from being seated next to unaccompanied children on airplanes.
Personally, I would be very happy to be relocated away from 'all' children on airplanes, but this issue has upset quite a number of people, and with good reason.
In September 2004, I wrote an article entitled "BenDedek Upsets Canadians at Magic City" in which I quoted from the FATHERS CANADA 4 JUSTICE Website which states that the website stands "in opposition to the Radical man hating verity of socialism and Feminism". Calling itself a voice in favor of "defending liberal western democracy", and pointing out that the website content is of the same style as found on feminist resources and websites, they maintain that their "Whole point is to hold up a mirror".
As they proudly boast, " My Freedom and Rights and my Children's Freedom of Rights are not for sale at any price".
This then is the matter at the heart of the issue of Qantas Airlines and New Zealand Airlines, removing MALES from proximity to children. Men are being Demonised ONCE AGAIN!
Here is the circumstance that has MALES upset.
"It's emerged Auckland man MARK WORSLEY was approached after take-off on the Christchurch to Auckland flight last year and told to change seats with a woman because he was sitting next to a young boy travelling alone. He says he was gobsmacked at the request and embarrassed."
If this had happened to a WOMAN, all hell would have broken loose.
--Have we gone mad ! Why not just cage us all in the rear of the plane. How sexist and demeaning. You had better start removing the bloke flying the plane, I'm concerned that he may be a child abuser also. And what about that steward ? I feel sad for our male children growing up in these times, what chance have they got?
--One women caller said it would be safer if they sat next to a female !!
--As for men being a danger to children, how about xxxxxxxx who supplied little girls to a convicted paedophile & even gave them $10 each time after one complained. She kidnapped her own child & gave her back to the convicted paedophile.
--There is only one solution! If these people do not want you sitting next to their children, we should ask (no demand for your own protection from false allegations) segregated seating on all public transport, in restaurants, cinemas and anywhere else you can think where seating of mixed gender occurs.
--Lets face it, these changes are only being instigated because enough women have sounded off about their (probably exaggerated) concerns (I am racking my brain trying to recall the last time I saw a headline about such an occurrence of molestation actually occurring on a plane) or does this mean that it is occurring and these airlines know about it and are now trying to cover their collective arses, or does this just mean that more paedophile males prefer to fly Qantas and Air New Zealand and the airlines have just figgered this out and are afraid of the bad publicity.
--It will be a return to apartheid, except it will not be based on colour or race but on gender! Now that's progress for us!
--Swiss Santas are banned from sitting children on their laps
--They wont get the chance to force such prejudices upon my children.
This issue is not about protecting children from abuse, it is nothing short of 'Prejudice and Discrimination', for the express purpose of demonising men.
Last week I published an email at Magic City about Divorced and Separated men suiciding because of the way they are being treated in the courts. Treatment I might add that is not only totally discriminating against men, but wholly instigated by Women. Divorce Courts - Worse than Auschwitz It is in the self interests of rabid 'Men Hating' nazi feminists to put MALES as far from any influence in the lives of children as possible. It "empowers" them. Now that is 'child abuse'.
Far from the hype dumped on us by the older generation feminists (the younger feminists rightly reject such demonising ways), let me repeat what I said in the article quoted above: "The bloody and uncaring barbarians are the feminists and the courts!"
Under such a law, this very article might qualify as a breach of the law, and I could be punished for speaking out against the despicable treatment that men cop.
At the end of that article I wrote: "We have to stop looking backwards. We have to stop being complacent. We had better start looking forward to see what road we are on, where we are going, and whether we really want to go there".
We have had a generation or so of MALE BASHING; of reducing the image and status of men to that of the 'base, uncaring dominating predator'. How do you reverse decades of indoctrination that says, men are evil? Certainly not by sitting back and copping it sweet.
In my comments to the Dads In Distress email posted at KingsCalendar, I raised a very important but rarely mentioned point.
Statistics show that:
Divorce rates in the last 60 years have skyrocketed.
Most divorces are instituted by women.
Most (Divorce) children live with their mothers.
Most (Divorce) children have little or no contact with their fathers.
Mothers consider themselves to be the true role models for their kids.
AND YET: I remember watching an American program on feminism, in which Feminist organisations admit that young males are as sexist and chauvinistic today as their fathers, and that feminism was failing to change the attitudes of these young men.
The question begs asking, "What is it then that make these young men sexist?"
Of course, the stock standard accusation is that it must be the government's fault, and that the Government must do something.
In today's feminist world, everything is 'female centered'. For instance, as one person who emailed Tony Miller at Dads in Distress wrote: "We also keep talking about things like breast cancer. Cancer affecting men kills more than breast cancer does. Do we hear about that? No, not at all.
When I was in a university 13 years ago, a visiting feminist lecturing on Domestic Violence, in response to questions about abuse of Husbands, not only believed that it hardly occurred because statistics don't show it (like yeah Doc..my wife broke my arm when she beat me up!), but actually and publically said: 'The incidence is so low as to be of no importance!"
An email critique of that article was that I had not 'Proved' that this was the case, and that I should not say something that I cannot 'prove' or demonstrate to be true. Well, what proof are the Qantas and New Zealand Airlines offering to substantiate the necessity of seating men separately from children travelling alone?
Like the United Nations which constantly blames Israel for everything and simply refuses to 'SEE' what goes on in Palestine, (Photographs of Child Abuse in Israel) nobody gives a damn about reality. Nobody really cares about the 'victims'.
It is all a self interested game, which might be best summed up by a 'joke' I received in the email:
Two bleeding heart liberals come across a man laying in the street.
He had been robbed and beaten to a pulp.
They quickly set off to find the culprit.
"He has a real emotional need that we can meet!"
You think that is a joke?
Try this. A separated women, giving lectures to women, for a religious women's organisation, on the subject of 'Healthy Emotional Relationships'. During this time, she constantly sought the organisers help in 'restoring her marriage'. When it was finally revealed that she in fact was having an affair with a married man, what do you think was the response? Certainly not that perhaps her marriage breakdown was not entirely her husband's fault - that's for sure! No! It was: 'Oh the poor dear! Obviously her lies are indicative of a deep personal need! We need to care for her!'.
MEN ARE NOT IMPORTANT! They are the dirt under the feet of Women!
Just as Americans through apathy, let the Gay agenda take over society, not bothering to voice their objections until the issue of 'Gay Marriage' arose, Men all over the world, need to stop sitting back and letting 'self interest' groups destroy them.
Any psychologist will tell you that children need strong Male role models! How can any man be a role model, when at every turn, he is painted as a violent, dominating, deviate, pervert and Child Abuser?
Women are responsible for more than half of all child abuse cases in Queensland and are much more likely to neglect their children than men, a new report has found.
The report shows there were 13,184 substantiated child abuse cases across Queensland in 2005-06. Women were responsible for 7,319 - or 55.5 per cent - of cases, and males for 5,846, or 44.3 per cent.
In 2005-06, females were responsible for 80.2 per cent of all cases of neglect - 3,283 cases compared 799 cases for men.
Child Safety Minister Desley Boyle said the findings shattered society's image of the caring and devoted mother and the belief that men were more likely to abuse children. "We have an idealised image of mothers - that they feed their kids before themselves - but I'm sorry to say, it's not always true," Ms Boyle said.
The debate over whether access to pornography can change the way a person behaves - or, indeed, whether it will ultimately lead to the collapse of Western culture - has raged for decades, even centuries. Ask any Feminazi and they will tell you that men are degenerates, and that porno degrades women and leads to all sorts of manifestations of sexism and discrimination. But AS PROVED in this article, porno affects no one. (The Fems lied!)
Emotional Abuse: Child Abuse: Husband Abuse: Female Abusers: Activist Abuse: in this article, I am going to look at the issue of 'Emotional Abuse', through a variety of lenses. Each lens filters and uses information gleaned from articles related to the abuse of men by women. We will start with a look at abuse within religious and political contexts, before moving on to address issues related to Children and their fathers.
I constantly rail against all those wonderful apparently 'human loving' individuals who in their 'alleged' love for humanity would not hesitate to commit murder at the drop of a hat because they are just so damn sure of the righteousness of their cause and their actions. If you look at the history of totalitarianism in the 20th century, you will see that the first step in the long march to success, is to rip apart the traditional fabric of society. The politically correct who want to control our thoughts and actions, have already made sure that their own 'personal' objections to minority culture have already been excised
Yesterday, Wednesday November 14th, 2012 at about 11am Beijing Time or about dawn in Israel, I published an article at Kingscalendar asking why Israel does not fight back. This morning (7 am Beijing Time) I read that Israel had commenced operations against Gaza. Tonight (6.15pm Beijing Time) as I sit in China reading world news I am disgusted by what I see.
What other country in history has ever been required to provide all the basic necessities to enable their enemy to attack and murder them? Until Israel wakes up to the fact that no one really cares about Israel or Jews; until Israel wakes up that Political Correctness is just a tool by which people can hide their true feelings whilst showing a compassionate face, then Israel is doing nothing more than committing slow suicide. No one cares! No one wants Israel there! They all want to lick the boots of Activist Agendas and Arab Oil and they believe that Israel is worth sacrificing if it means peace from terrorism (but it won't).
Mingxing's company had booked him into the upmarket Kempinski Hotel in Wuxi and he organized and paid for one extra day so that we could go sightseeing. There are two photos in Part one that relate to the Kempinski Hotel Room, but this photo is of the lavish foyer of the Hotel as taken from the first floor landing above the coffee shop. Whilst the Big Buddha is the 'centerpiece' so to speak, the real spectacular is to be found in the Cultural Museum. This place is one helluva spectacular place inside. It sits directly opposite the replica of the Potala Palace, and when you enter you are required to put coverings over your shoes. I suspect that the real reason is to cut down on the cleaning bill. This place was crowded and all those people shuffling along wearing shoe protectors gave the marble floor a really high sheen.
It was decided that unshod horses would not be allowed to be used in commercial ventures. People couldn't ride horses for a living; salesman couldn't load goods onto their horses; and horses could no longer pull carts. While it all seemed quite logical and humane, the unforeseen consequence of the law was that the supply of goods into and out of the town began to dwindle, until in the end, business after business went bankrupt. As time went by the whole city went bust until the only ones left were those who could not afford to move, and one of these was our blacksmith. One day, considering that since the council itself was now gone, the blacksmith decided to restart his business.
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]
About the KingsCalendar Publisher
R.P.BenDedek is the owner and Editor of KingsCalendar.com which was originally set up to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran'.
Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah.