You can't claim to be a victim of aggression when it was you yourself who deliberately provoked the attack. I wonder how many of them would approve of the anti-democratic movement now flourishing in Australia under the politically correct banner of 'Anti-Racism.' So what is the end goal for the Counter-protestors - Australian Democracy or Chinese Communism?
Prominent lawyer, Mariam Veiszadeh, should get a grip on herself
I recently wrote an article titled: The Real Reason Why I Cannot Support RECLAIM Australia, which was all about the current threat to democracy in Australia by Political Correctness Activist Groups seeking to provoke and attack a group of people who are opposed to Muslim immigration and a host of other things. From that article:
I published the "Tongue-in-cheek" article above in April 2015 and on July 17th I came across this article which states that once again "democracy loving" Politically Correct Sociopathic Idiots are waging a war against free speech, and using violence to do so. The article states quite clearly that police used capsicum spray and horses to quell rowdy protestors trying to disrupt the anti-Islam rally. This situation in which politically correct people are opposing democracy and doing it with violence is becoming worse and worse. In a Democracy, everyone has a right to an opinion and everyone has the right to protest. But these 'so-called' Politically Correct, humanitarian, tolerant of other cultures, Democracy loving people have been deliberately trying to overthrow democracy and deliberately orchestrating clashes with the 'Anti-Muslim' and 'anti-immigration' group called Reclaim Australia.
It is interesting to note that the article links in the original article which provide reporting on the violent nature of the PC counter protestors now lead nowhere. Apparently someone has pulled all the articles which painted the PC people in their true light.
In the most recent report on the clash between the two factions, titled: "Reclaim Australia supporter charged with threatening to slit the throat of prominent lawyer" by Rachel Olding at MSN news we are informed that Muslims are being threatened and targeted by the anti-Islam group, Reclaim Australia:
A Reclaim Australia supporter has been charged with threatening to slit the throat of a prominent Sydney lawyer and campaigner against Islamophobia. Mariam Veiszadeh reported the online threat to NSW Police, who last week charged a mother-of-three from Guildford with using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend. In a private message sent to Ms Veiszadeh on Facebook, the 37-year-old woman allegedly said she would "find you and hunt you down". "Watch as we come for you in your sleep [and] cut your throat as you do [to] the animals you torment," said the rambling message sent at 11.06pm on July 12.
The victim named above, stated that "movements like Reclaim Australia have been gaining momentum and sprouting "vitriol, preaching hatred and ultimately inciting violence towards Australian Muslims". "These threats issued against me are proof of it," she said.
I found that a really interesting statement considering that according to the defenders of Muslims worldwide, threats, bombings, murder and general terrorism carried out by Muslims in the world, are the responsibility of an insignificant number of hard-line, fanatical fundamentalists and they don't represent the majority of Muslims. (Of course Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America will tell you that the silent majority are irrelevant).
If the Islamic terrorists like ISIS and the other 75 or so groups worldwide, who spew forth their hatred of the West and its Christians and Jews represent only an insignificant percentage of all Muslims and therefore we have no reason to be afraid, then I would suggest that prominent lawyer Mariam Veiszadeh get a grip on herself and understand that these threatening bastards are merely an insignificant percentage of Non-Muslims in society and therefore do not represent the majority views of Australia.
It is interesting to note that one of the things the Reclaim Australia group dislikes is the Halal Certification issue in Australia. It seems strange to me that an insignificant percentage of Australians should be able to force their religious views on all Australians by requiring Halal Certification across the board. What businesses would find it necessary to pay attention to an insignificant group of customers and risk the backlash from the majority of customers? So either Muslims in Australia are not an insignificant percentage of the population, or big business knows something that the rest of the population of Australia does not. Perhaps this Halal Certification is just laying the groundwork to receive a major increase in Islamic population. Then again, maybe it is just that the political clout of that insignificant number of Muslims is far greater than anyone knows. Perhaps there is a lot of backroom activity concerning which the general populace remains unaware.
At any rate, in my book, you can't claim to be a victim of aggression when it was you yourself who deliberately provoked the attack. Of course in PC terminology the victim may do anything AT ALL and remain innocent as long as they are the ones who come out all bloodied.
Democracy is democracy or it is not. If the counter-protestors have a right to protest, why is it that they claim that Reclaim Australia does not have such a right. When governments or activists or Lawyers who should know and uphold the law, insist that specific groups of people should have their democratic rights and privileges removed, then it is only a matter of time before we all lose our rights and privileges.
I suggest that the prominent lawyer grab a dictionary and look up the word incitement. Reclaim Australia in the exercise of its rights and privileges may act like a red rag to a bull, but when the bull charges, it does so because it has been trained to do so. So who is training the PC counter protestors?
Living in the People's Republic of China as I do and have done for a dozen years, I have heard many accusations made against the government of this country in relation to its 'control' of the population. I wonder how many Chinese people here would love to have the same right Australians do to protest their government's policies and I wonder how many of them would approve of the anti-democratic movement now flourishing in Australia under the politically correct banner of 'Anti-Racism.' So what is the end goal for the Counter-protestors - Australian Democracy or Chinese Communism?
I think I will stick with Aussie freedoms - especially those espoused in the following youtube musical videos
As far as accusation of Islamophobia are concerned, let me finish with this August 2nd 2015 quote from "We must talk about Islam: A faith that affects everyone should be susceptible to critique by all" by Jeffrey Taylor, Contributing Editor, The Atlantic
"'Islamophobia' and 'Islamophobic' are bludgeoning terms of political jargon wielded to suppress free speech and render Islam off-limits for anything but accolades, or, at least, neutral acceptance."
Since 2004 he has been writing academic articles, social commentaries and photographic 'Stories from China' both here at KingsCalendar, and formerly as a contributing columnist at Magic City Morning Star News (Maine USA) where from 2009 to 2015 he was Stand-in Editor. He currently has a column at iPatriot.com and teaches English to Business English and Flight Attendant College Students in Suzhou City Jiangsu Province People's Republic of China.)
BenDedek originally created the site to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran.' Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah. Check the Chapter Precis Page to see details of each chapter and to gain access to the Four Free to Air Chapters
(The Download book does not contain a section on Seder Olam)
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]