These high priest and priestess of the religion of Regressivism seem to be following their liberal doctrines faithfully. How is the chronic lying practiced by regressives any different than lying encouraged by Islamisist as a "means to an end" in pursuit of Jihad? By Jihad, I mean any current definition you choose. Don't be distracted by the never ending debate over the meaning of one word. I hold no reverence for the "religion of peace" or for the "religion of liberalism" in that they both are antithetical to America's founding culturally and philosophically.
"Beware the Ides of March"
By Patrick J. Fornari (9:11 AM 3/22/2015 Beijing Time)
Hillary Clinton's recent one woman show which debuted at the Theater of the Absurd, otherwise known as the UN, clearly portrays the Progressive Jihad being waged against America. I couldn't help but think, what does this mean for our Republic? As many know, I refer to the progressive movement as "Regressivism," which in my opinion, is an infinitely more accurate description of the movement and the Old World tenants religiously touted by its advocates. And so, I will again.
I have listened to politicians and pundits from both sides of the political aisle express their disdain for; "Hillary thinking she is above the law." From where I sit in the cheap seats, it appears she is. Not only is it more "convenient" for Hillary, but it is also more convenient for political and media elites. These high priest and priestess of the religion of Regressivism seem to be following their liberal doctrines faithfully. How is the chronic lying practiced by regressives any different than lying encouraged by Islamisist as a "means to an end" in pursuit of Jihad? By Jihad, I mean any current definition you choose. Don't be distracted by the never ending debate over the meaning of one word.
I hold no reverence for the "religion of peace" or for the "religion of liberalism" in that they both are antithetical to America's founding culturally and philosophically. Both Jihadist and regressive condone "any means to an end" as a legitimate religious and political tactic of influence. Ironically, liberal elite's who incessantly proclaim the "separation of church and state" as their mantra, simultaneously promote a type of American political theocracy underpinned by extreme political correctness, deception, and ceaseless indoctrination.
Hillary Clinton proudly defines herself as a "Modern American Progressive." This is akin to shouting from the rooftops, "I'm a liar and I want everyone to know it!" I don't feel that writing phrases such as "less than forthright" or "disingenuous at best" as substitutes for the word lying demonstrate tolerance or civility. Use of those phrases can only denote intentional ignorance on my part. Let's dismiss the happy talk and embrace the reality of our present situation. You must listen to your own gut, because I can scarcely think of a politician or pundit that has the average working Americans best interest at heart. Happy talk just won't cut it.
Many historians consider the Ides of March and the assassination of Julius Caesar as signifying the end of the Roman Republic and beginning of Roman Imperialism. Is Hillary's email press conference evidence of America's transition to imperial rule? Maybe, after all the Regressives continue to encourage the incremental abandonment of our unique republic and its ideals.
The passing of March 15th 2015 underscores the need for America to watch its back. I offer these words of warning to president Obama, and the American people: "Beware the Ides of March."
Patrick J. Fornari was born and raised in Indiana, and spent the first half of his three plus decade construction career working in the Midwest and Western United States, including Illinois, Wyoming, Washington, Colorado, California and Arizona. For the second half of his career, he worked construction on several Caribbean islands, giving him a unique perspective on his home country. Fornari currently lives in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
Commoner Sense" By Patrick J. Fornari iUniverse Press Published 3/7/2014 ISBN: 978-1-4917-2273-2 156 pages Softcover $16 E-book $4
Government does not produce anything of value, so why do politicians, who claim devotion to public service, deserve money or power? This is why Americans identify with Mr. Trump. Many Americans view Trump as having made his money the old fashioned way, through hard work and risk at the top tiers of the world market. A politician may get a highway or airport named after them, but they didn’t build that.
They claim that the most conservative republican is the candidate Republicans should run. They have decades of credibility at stake if Trump were to win the presidency. However, they face a problem they didn’t anticipate in that Trump’s basic platform consist of three very conservative planks; border security, the economy and the military. All three add up to one overarching concern; security. Without, border, economic and military security a country can be distracted to a point that threatens collapse, as are some in Europe.
Despite all the hysterical accusations made by the sociopathic ideologues, the reality is that REAL everyday Muslims who have left their homelands to settle in democracy loving western lands DON’T WANT to be controlled by Islamists. They more than anyone else know what living under Islamic (theocratic) political and social control means.
In China, the rights of society take precedence over individual human rights. This, we Westerners call totalitarianism and from an ideological perspective, desire to destroy it right? But ask yourself this: “What does MY country promote?”
That there are probably many errors and circular arguments in relation to ancient history is attested to by many, including Colin Renfrew, Professor of Archaeology, Cambridge University (James Et. Al. 1991 : foreword pages.xiii-xv)
Since 2004 he has been writing academic articles, social commentaries and photographic 'Stories from China' both here at KingsCalendar, and formerly as a contributing columnist at Magic City Morning Star News (Maine USA) where from 2009 to 2015 he was Stand-in Editor. He currently has a column at iPatriot.com and teaches English to Business English and Flight Attendant College Students in Suzhou City Jiangsu Province People's Republic of China.)
BenDedek originally created the site to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran.' Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah. Check the Chapter Precis Page to see details of each chapter and to gain access to the Four Free to Air Chapters
(The Download book does not contain a section on Seder Olam)
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]