Muslim Children Call for End to Democracy in Australia. When you vilify people for objecting to Muslims, their dress, their beliefs and their customs, how can you yourself then be justified in vilifying Muslims. If we were to object to Muslim parents teaching their kids about jihad, about the overthrow of democracy, the damnation of feminists, homosexuals, abortionists, Jews and Christians, then we must of necessity object to what Roman Catholics, Evangelical Protestants, Baptists, Jews, Democrats and Republicans (in America), Labour, Liberal and National Party members in Australia, Feminists, Homosexuals and pro-abortionists teach their children about their beliefs.
Catch 22 in PC: Defending Muslim Children in Australia
Muslim Children Call for End to Democracy in Australia
Recently in the Australian press there was an article about a video of radicalized Muslim children that was shown on television. It reported that "In the vision, children as young as six years old call for violent action against non-Muslims and to reject Australia and its values."
A terror risk expert says it's brainwashing, aimed at creating violent extremists. The video shows four Australian children, aged six to 13, calling for an end to our way of life....The children promise to die fighting to end democracy in Australia, replacing it with a Caliphate ruled by Islamic Sharia law.
Before I continue, I need to point out quite seriously that I have a very deep seated objection to the event listed in the article. These kids and their parents stand against democracy. They stand against our way of life, our culture and traditions. Some people want the parents to be punished and the children removed from their care. I do not agree with such action, but I do agree with anyone who would say: "If they don't like it here - get out!"
Having said that, I find myself genuinely facing a dilemma for you see, I believe that every set of parents has the right to raise their children according to the religious, political and social precepts of those parents. If we were to object to Muslim parents teaching their kids about jihad, about the overthrow of democracy, the damnation of feminists, homosexuals, abortionists, Jews and Christians, then we must of necessity object to what Roman Catholics, Evangelical Protestants, Baptists, Jews, Democrats and Republicans (in America), Labour, Liberal and National Party members in Australia, Feminists, Homosexuals and pro-abortionists teach their children about their beliefs.
It's a real Catch 22 and demonstrates the true nature of political correctness, about which I have been writing for the past ten years. It's called the 'Law of Unintended Consequences.' When you vilify people for objecting to Muslims, their dress, their beliefs and their customs, how can you yourself then be justified in vilifying Muslims. Naturally the answer must be that we cannot condone that which openly threatens our security, and we will undoubtedly point out that these are just a few individuals and therefore do not represent the whole of Islam. The same could be said for pedophile Roman Catholic Priests, but that doesn't stop people denigrating the whole of Roman Catholicism and Christianity in General. If a person can be prosecuted for speaking ill of Islam and Muslims, then those same laws ought to be applied to those speaking ill of Christians and Christianity.
There is an old saying that 'what is good for the goose is good for the gander,' which in this case means that if in accordance with politically correct ideology you insist that it is wrong to insult Islam and Muslims, then you must also stand up for - not against - Christians and Christianity when they are insulted. Why is it that in our PC world, it is wrong to crack a joke that denigrates women, but it is not wrong to make the same type of jokes about men? Equality and non-discrimination mean exactly that and cannot be redefined to mean equality and non-discrimination for some but not for others, and if you were to decide that such should be the case, who is it that makes that call? This was precisely the point in The Price of Political Correctness (October 23, 2014) in which I referred to two situations in America in which the 'Gay Agenda' threatens the rights of non-gays, all in the name of political correctness of course. It is also one of the issues raised in Part 2 (Auditing Ethnic Culture) in When Multiculturalism is not OK! which I published in September of 2009.
The explanation for why 'we' are called racist when we do not like something about a foreign culture, while at the same time that culture is not permitted to fully flourish on our soil, is that those in charge of making sure that we are all equal and receive 'fair' treatment, and that we should embrace each other's cultures, are also the arbiters of what 'cultural practices' the ethnic minorities can and cannot bring into our country.
Politically Correct Multiculturalists objects to citizens criticizing 'immigrants' and particularly 'Muslims' because it goes against their ideological perspective. But who says their perspective is correct? Are those same people now criticizing the Australian parents and children mentioned in the opening paragraph? If not, then why not? If so, then why so?
Living in China as I do, I can only read the online news so I don't know how the affair is being considered in the street and on television, but I can give you one reason why many of the allegedly PC people would not be criticizing these potential jihadis, and that is that to do so would compromise their anti-Israel/pro-Hamas political stance. To object to these Muslims in Australia teaching these violent beliefs to their children would be tantamount to rejection of exactly the same parenting practiced in Palestine. The Catch 22 is of course that if these types did criticize these Muslim parents, then they would be making hypocrites of themselves. (Don't you know it is un-PC to critize immigrants?) Then there is the whole thing about Australia being a Democracy and how people in a democracy have the right to express their opinions as long as they aren't Politically Incorrect.
As was recently demonstrated in the Middle East with the execution of an Australian Muslim by ISIL, being Muslim does not guarantee any Muslim's safety when the Islamic revolution hits. In fact, if you look at the history behind all the sectarian Muslim vs. Muslim violence in the Middle East, the only guarantee of anything in any Western country if the Islamists manage to take over is that NO ONE - no Muslim, Jew, Christian or otherwise would be safe! (Nov 3rd - Muslim in Sydney Australia shot by [apparently] opposing Islamic Group)
The PC pandering to Muslims in the West needs to stop! It's time for Political Correctness to be put down like the rabid dog that it is! Yes! I said 'Rabid Dog!' Once it infects you, you go mad and ultimately die!
One does not need to believe in or hold to Political Correctness Ideology to be a decent person who shows respect to all people; to be non-discriminatory; to be egalitarian; to be understanding and caring; to be thoughtful and helpful; to be a good, upright, decent CITIZEN. Muslims, Jews, Christians, Gays, straights, and black, white and brindle men and women have a right to be treated honestly and decently in an open democratic decent secular country. They also have a right to their opinions - even if others disagree!
The Muslims mentioned in the first paragraph have a right to their beliefs. On the other hand, as citizens they owe allegiance to Australia and if they cannot give that allegiance, then they are enemies of the state! End of Story!
When I look at the news and see the LIES, the crass stupidity, the blatant hypocrisy, hatred masking itself as love, totalitarianism calling itself anti-fascist, and the intentional program of deceiving an entire nation and future generations, it makes me sick to the stomach and I am reminded of The book of Romans Chapter 1 around verse 28/29 which talks about what happens to people who refuse to acknowledge truth but call truth lies and call the lie truth.
Unfortunately (and even today in the Christian world this still applies), people mistakenly believe that they can ‘earn the grace’ of God by doing those things which a righteous man does. The fallacy in this type of thinking is obvious when you consider how many (self-proclaimed) righteous, loving, tolerant, non-discriminatory, immigrant welcoming, anti-Trump’s wall, anti-homophobic and anti-islamophobic people there are in the world who would not for a moment hesitate to beat you up, shout you down, hound you, stalk you, curse you, call for your death, seek to have you fired from your job and generally act like nazis toward you simply because you voted for Donald Trump.
When counter protesters set out to impede, provoke and confront an opposing ideological group, what results is what one would expect to result and only the idiotic, mindless, anally retentive and just plain stupid person would claim that it is not their fault that the protesters got upset or took action against them. But who are we kidding here? Counter protesters don’t believe in righteousness or otherwise. They are just rabble – SS troopers – sent in to do their master’s bidding. Give them all a baton and gun and see how quickly they will turn into killing machines to rid society of all its evils – starting with Donald Trump of course!
Mao Wenwen reminded me that when she was my student I would often refer to her as Mao Zedong. I do that sometimes – calling students by the names of famous or infamous people. Paying honor to me as her English teacher Mao Wenwen provided me the coffee free of charge (courtesy of the management). She also invited Johnny and me to come inside and take a look around, and once I did, I decided that I wanted to come back to take photos. Receiving permission from the owner, all I needed was the chance to get back.
I’m sure if you understand what Sociology is that you would find my statement rather strange for it leads to the question of what impact the King’s Calendar Research Result has on society and societal problems. But before we go look at that aspect, I want to talk about the personal aspect – MY aspect.
The demolition came as row between the church and government escalated over allegations the church refused to pay a £450 arbitrary road usage fee. Pastor Zhang Di was summoned for questioning last month and accused of assaulting police officers and attacking a village official. So when I read reports as in the link you sent and see the ACTUAL TRUTH in the middle of the article, I know that there is a lot more going on than is being reported.
Since 2004 he has been writing academic articles, social commentaries and photographic 'Stories from China' both here at KingsCalendar, and formerly as a contributing columnist at Magic City Morning Star News (Maine USA) where from 2009 to 2015 he was Stand-in Editor. He currently has a column at iPatriot.com and teaches English to Business English and Flight Attendant College Students in Suzhou City Jiangsu Province People's Republic of China.)
BenDedek originally created the site to publicize his research results into the Chronology of Ancient Israel. Those results were published under the title: 'The King's Calendar: The Secret of Qumran.' Whilst there have been many attempts to solve the chronological riddle of the Bible's synchronisms of reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah and their synchronism with other Ancient Near Eastern Nations, no other research is based on a simple mathematical formula which could, if it is incorrect, be disproved easily. To date, no one has been able to dismiss the mathematical results of this research.
Free to air Academic articles set forth Apologetics for and results of his discovery of an "artificial chronological scheme" running through the Bible, Josephus, the Damascus Documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Seder Olam Rabbah. Check the Chapter Precis Page to see details of each chapter and to gain access to the Four Free to Air Chapters
(The Download book does not contain a section on Seder Olam)
Definition: King's Calendar Chronological Research
The Premise: Between the 5th and 3rd centuries BCE (but continuing down to at least 104 BCE), Sectarian redactors transcribed the legitimate 'solar year' chronological records of Israel and Judah, into an artificial form, with listed years as each comprised of 12 months of 4 weeks of 7 days, or 336 days per year, thus creating a 13th artificial year where 12 solar years existed.
When the Synchronous Chronological Data provided in the Books of Kings and Chronicles for the Divided Kingdom Period are measured in years of 336 days, the synchronisms actually align. [Refer to Appendix 5. to see how it synchronises the Divided Kingdom Period]